Operational Risk Management in an Unstable Global Supply Chain

Global supply chain instability driven by geopolitical volatility, climate-related disruptions, energy crises, and logistical bottlenecks has intensified operational risks across industries. This study aims to analyze key sources of operational risk and identify effective mitigation strategies using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The SLR process involved the identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and thematic analysis of 26 relevant peer-reviewed publications from the last decade. The findings reveal that operational risks originate from supplier fragility, geographic dependency, macroeconomic uncertainty, climate-related hazards, and technological vulnerabilities. Mitigation strategies identified include supplier diversification, inventory optimization, digital visibility systems, production regionalization, scenario modeling, and inter-organizational risk collaboration. The study also finds that an integrated risk management model such as incorporating digital early-warning systems, rapid response capabilities, long-term adaptive capacity, and strategic collaboration, offers the most effective approach to enhancing global supply chain resilience. It concludes that firms must strengthen technological integration and organizational capacity to respond adaptively to disruptions, while public-policy support is essential to reinforce logistics infrastructure and digitalization, particularly in developing economies.

1. Adim, C. V., & Unaam, A. O. (2022). Environmental Turbulence and the Imperatives of Strategic Flexibility in the Post Covid-19 Era. Nigerian Academy of Management Journal, 17(1), 201-207McKinsey Global Institute. (2022). Global rethinking: Digital transformation and resilience. McKinsey & Company.
2. Akbar, H. M., & Isfianadewi, D. (2023). The role of supply chain resilience to relationships supply chain risk management culture and firm performance during disruption. International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science, 12(2).
3. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik industri pengolahan 2023. BPS RI.
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.
5. Chen, S., Meng, Q., & Choi, T. M. (2022). Transportation research Part E-logistics and transportation review: 25 years in retrospect. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 161, 102709.
6. Deloitte. (2023). Global consumer tracker report 2023. Deloitte Insights.
7. Elliott, M., Golub, B., & Leduc, M. V. (2022). Supply network formation and fragility. American Economic Review, 112(8), 2701-2747.
8. International Monetary Fund. (2023). World economic outlook: Navigating global divergences. IMF.
9. Johnson, J. E., & Haug, P. (2021). Modifications to global supply chain management strategies resulting from recent trade disruptions: an exploratory study. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 14(4), 701-722.
10. Kaur, V. (2023). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities: a scientometric analysis of marriage between knowledge management and dynamic capabilities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 919-952.
11. OECD. (2023). Economic outlook 2023: Fragmentation risks and global supply chains. OECD Publishing.
12. Orlando, B., Tortora, D., Pezzi, A., & Bitbol-Saba, N. (2022). The disruption of the international supply chain: Firm resilience and knowledge preparedness to tackle the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of international management, 28(1), 100876.
13. Romero-Silva, R., Santos, J., & Hurtado-Hernández, M. (2024). A conceptual framework of the applicability of production scheduling from a contingency theory approach: addressing the theory-practice gap. Production Planning & Control, 35(3), 262-282.
14. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
15. Subramaniam, Y., & Loganathan, N. (2022). Uncertainty and technological innovation: evidence from developed and developing countries. Economic Change and Restructuring, 55(4), 2527-2545.
16. Um, J., & Han, N. (2021). Understanding the relationships between global supply chain risk and supply chain resilience: the role of mitigating strategies. Supply chain management: an international journal, 26(2), 240-255.
17. UNCTAD. (2023). Global trade update 2023. United Nations Publications.
18. United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). Adaptation gap report 2022. UNEP.
19. World Bank. (2023). Global economic prospects 2023: Slow growth, rising risks. World Bank Publications.
20. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Research Review, 28, 1–17.