The Right of Inquiry of The House of Representatives in the Constitutional System: Between The Supervisory Function and The Potential for Abuse

Authors

  • Darsis Humah Fakultas Syariah IAIN Ternate

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61942/jhk.v2i5.436

Keywords:

right of inquiry, DPR, supervisory function, constitutional system, abuse of power.

Abstract

The right of inquiry is one of the constitutional rights of the House of Representatives as regulated in Article 20A paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution and the MD3 Law as an instrument of supervision over the government. After the amendment of the 1945 Constitution, the position of the House of Representatives has been strengthened as an important actor in the checks and balances mechanism. However, in practice, the use of the right of inquiry often raises debate, both as a form of constitutional supervision and as a political bargaining tool that has the potential to be abused. This article aims to analyze the position of the DPR's right of inquiry in the Indonesian constitutional system, identify its function and relevance to democracy, and examine its potential abuse in contemporary political practice. This research uses  a normative juridical  approach with a qualitative analysis method through literature review, laws and regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and SINTA and Scopus indexed scientific publications for the 2020–2025 period. The results of the study show that normatively, the right of inquiry has a strong and relevant legal basis to strengthen the principles of accountability and transparency of governance. However, regulatory weaknesses, especially related to the follow-up of investigation results, make the effectiveness of the right of inquiry often limited. In addition, the dominance of the political majority in parliament and the tendency to politicize make the right of inquiry more often used as a political instrument than as an instrument of substantive supervision. In conclusion, the urgency of strengthening the right to inquiry lies in regulatory reform, strengthening the ethical mechanism of the House of Representatives, and increasing civil society participation, so that this right truly functions as a democratic instrument to prevent abuse of power

References

REFERENCE

Feulner, F. (2024). The Indonesian House of Representatives and its role during democratic regression. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 12, 229–251. DOI: 10.1080/20508840.2024.2351763

Hermanto, A.-A. (2024). (Article on MK Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023). The Theory and Practice of Legislation. DOI: 10.1080/20508840.2024.2316507

Razak, A., & Amin, F. (2023). Constitutional inquiry rights in evaluating Constitutional Court decisions: A case study of MK Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Rechtsidee, 12(2). DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1012

Haryani, R., & Sumiyanto, O. (2023). Juridical analysis of the right of inquiry of the House of Representatives in performing the supervisory function. Awang Long Law Review, 6(1). DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i1.797

Panggabean, D. (2022). Implementation of the right of inquiry of the House of Representatives in controlling government policies. Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion, 3(1). DOI: 10.51622/njlo.v3i1.609

Fahmi, S. (2020). Perspective of constitutional law: The right of inquiry of People’s Representative Environment. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 469, 012113. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/469/1/012113

Herlinanur, N., Pangestoeti, W., Putra, A., & Rahim, R. (2024). The role of the amendment of the 1945 Constitution in strengthening the check and balance system. Research Review: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 3(1). DOI: 10.54923/researchreview.v3i1.79

Nurhidayati, D., Denna, K., Widyaningrum, N., Aulia, P., Putri, R., Prayudha, T., & Hadji, K. (2024). Juridical analysis of the right of inquiry of the House of Representatives in the scope of election disputes. Journal of Public Relations, 2(2). DOI: 10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v2i2.3188

Indrastuti, L., Pradoto, W., Udjiwati, L., & Uud, D. (2024). Democratic political law in Indonesia after amendments to the 1945 UUD. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1). DOI: 10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2310

Mz, H. (2022). The involvement of the House of Representatives in filling the positions of Supreme Court Justice and Constitutional Judge. GANEC SWARA, 16(1). DOI: 10.35327/gara.v16i1.285

Mahendra, M., Burlian, P., & Yuswalina, Y. (2021). Analysis of fiqh siyasah on the role of the House of Representatives in Indonesian constitutional law. Muqaranah, 5(2). DOI: 10.19109/muqaranah.v5i2.10511

Tumewu, A., Runtunuwu, Y., & Simandjuntak, R. (2025). About the position of the right of inquiry in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia. Equator: Journal of Education and Social Humanities, 5(2). DOI: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i2.5866

Said, A. R., & Ahmad, S. (2024). The right of inquiry in strengthening the supervisory function of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia. Binamulia Law, 13(2), 361–376. DOI: 10.37893/jbh.v13i2.950

Sumartini, S., & Arifin, J. (2020). The function of the right of inquiry of the House of Representatives to conduct an investigation into the implementation of the law. Journal of Justice, 6(1), 23–44. DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v6i1.97

Ng, J., & Kurniawan, Y. (2022). The Parliament and cooperative oversight of the Indonesian armed forces: Why civil–military relations are stable but still in transition. Armed Forces & Society. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X221137281

Chandranegara, I. S., & Cahyawati, D. P. (2023). Conflict of interest prevention clause in the constitution: The study of the Indonesian Constitution. Heliyon, 9(3), e14679. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14679

Huda, N., Heriyanto, D. S. N., & Wardhana, A. F. G. (2021). The urgency of the constitutional preview of law on ratification of international treaty by the Constitutional Court in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(9), e07886. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07886

Anggono, B. D., Prabowo, R. A., & Mardika, Y. N. (2023). Constitutional Court and the past conflicts in post-authoritarian Indonesia. Constitutional Review, 9(1), 77–108. DOI: 10.31078/consrev913

Pratama, S. M., Rompis, A. E., & Nurzaman, R. A. (2021). The authority of the PTUN in examining the President's letter on the Job Creation Bill and its implications. Legal Treatise, 17(1), 11–25. DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v17i1.516

Juanda, & Ogiandafiz. (2022). Legal politics of the formation of regional regulations based on positive law. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 22(3), 494–505. DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.3.3112

Nurlette, P. (2020). The Corruption Eradication Commission is the object of the DPR's right of inquiry. SCIENCE, 26(1), 75–88. DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v26i1.213

Muin, S. A. (2020). The position of the right of inquiry as a supervisory function of state administration. Poverty Law Journal, 2(2), 113–122. DOI: 10.35877/454RI.kalabbirang134

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-08-28

How to Cite

Humah, D. (2025). The Right of Inquiry of The House of Representatives in the Constitutional System: Between The Supervisory Function and The Potential for Abuse. Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(5), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.61942/jhk.v2i5.436

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.