State Sovereignty And Territorial Boundaries In The Perspective Of International Law

Authors

  • Andre Kurniawan Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pertiba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61942/jhk.v3i4.619

Keywords:

state sovereignty, teritorial boundaries, international law, border disputes, international treaties

Abstract

State sovereignty is a fundamental principle of international law, grounded in the existence of clearly defined and legally recognized territory. The determination of land, maritime, and air boundaries is essential for safeguarding territorial integrity, national security, and peaceful interstate relations. Nevertheless, border disputes frequently arise due to conflicting interpretations of international treaties, ambiguous territorial delimitations, colonial legacies, geographical changes, and competing political and economic interests, posing significant challenges to regional and global stability. This study aims to examine the concept of state sovereignty under international law, analyze legal mechanisms for determining state boundaries, and identify the causes and resolution of border disputes resulting from treaty interpretation. Using normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and case study approaches, the study analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through qualitative methods. The findings indicate that international law provides a comprehensive framework for boundary determination through international treaties, customary international law, judicial decisions, and the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Border disputes may be resolved through negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or adjudication before the International Court of Justice. The study concludes that legal certainty over territorial boundaries is indispensable for the effective exercise of state sovereignty. Strengthened international cooperation, harmonized treaty interpretation, and more effective dispute resolution mechanisms are therefore essential to promote international peace, stability, and sustainable interstate relations

References

Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), hlm. 245–249.

Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), hlm. 234.

Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, hlm. 245–249.

Boer Mauna, International Law, pp. 333–335.

Boer Mauna, International Law, Second Edition (Bandung: Alumni, 2015), pp. 329–331.

Boer Mauna, International Law: Meaning, Role and Function in the Era of Global Dynamics, Second Edition (Bandung: Alumni, 2015), pp. 329–331.

Charter of the United Nations 1945, Article 2 paragraph (1) and (4).

Charter of the United Nations 1945, Article 2 paragraph (1) dan (4).

Charter of the United Nations 1945, Article 2 paragraph (1).

Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, 8th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), hlm. 629–632.

Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, 8th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), hlm. 105.

Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, 8th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), hlm. 105.

Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, 8th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), hlm. 629–632.

Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, hlm. 629–632.

J.G. Starke, Introduction to International Law, Tenth Edition (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010), p. 214.

Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law, 9th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), hlm. 351.

Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law, 9th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), hlm. 517–520.

Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law, 9th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), hlm. 351–353.

Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law, 9th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), hlm. 517–520.

Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law, 9th ed., hlm. 517–520.

Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law, 9th ed., hlm. 540–54

Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law, 9th ed., hlm. 540–543.

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States 1933, Article 1.

Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia), Judgment, International Court of Justice, 17 December 2002.

Surya P. Subedi, International Boundary Disputes and International Law (London: Routledge, 2021), hlm. 87–90.

Surya P. Subedi, International Boundary Disputes and International Law (London: Routledge, 2021), hlm. 87–90.

Surya P. Subedi, International Boundary Disputes and International Law (London: Routledge, 2021), hlm. 87–90.

Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space 1967, Article II.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, Parts II, V, and VI.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969, Article 26.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969, Article 31.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969, Article 32.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969, Articles 26 and 31.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Kurniawan, A. (2026). State Sovereignty And Territorial Boundaries In The Perspective Of International Law. Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(4), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.61942/jhk.v3i4.619

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.