Technology-Based Law Enforcement Transformation: An Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Integration in the Justice System

rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology presents both challenges and opportunities for the law enforcement and judicial system in Indonesia. This article comprehensively analyzes the integration of AI in the Indonesian judicial system, encompassing technical, legal, ethical, and institutional dimensions. Using normative, conceptual, and comparative legal research approaches, the study examines how AI can revolutionize the judicial process—from legal document analysis and verdict prediction to case management and fraud detection—while identifying the accompanying obstacles and risks. The research findings indicate that the implementation of AI in the judiciary in Indonesia is still in its infancy, hampered by regulatory fragmentation, digital infrastructure gaps, human resource capacity deficits, and the lack of a standard AI ethics framework. Comparatively, the experiences of the European Union through its AI Act and several Asia-Pacific countries provide important lessons on responsible AI governance. This article recommends the establishment of a comprehensive national legal framework, the development of an integrated judicial data infrastructure, the strengthening of the digital competence of judicial officials, and the adoption of Explainable AI principles to ensure that technological transformation does not compromise the values ​​of justice, accountability, and legal certainty.

1. Aristawati, Rahma Nur, Inggrid Yemima Sihombing, and Rizha Claudilla Putri. "Revolusi Digital dalam Hukum Acara Perdata: Penerapan Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa." Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 4.2 (2026): 3982-3990. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.4896
2. Ariyadi, Franky. "Algorithmic Bias Dalam Restorative Justice: Ancaman Bagi Marginal." National Multidisciplinary Sciences 4.3 (2025): 148-158. https://doi.org/10.32528/nms.v4i3.756
3. Asshiddiqie, Jimly & M. Ali Safa'at. Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006.
4. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Jilid II. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MK RI, 2006.
5. Calo, Ryan. "Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Primer and Roadmap." 51 UC Davis Law Review 399 (2017).
6. Eubanks, Virginia. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2018.
7. European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Brussels, 2021.
8. Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law, Revised Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.
9. Harahap, Aswindari, et al. "Analisis Diskresi Hakim dalam Mengintegrasikan Rekomendasi Penalaran Hukum Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) di Pengadilan Niaga." Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 4.9 (2025): 734-745. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v4i9.789
10. Hasanuddin, Moh, and Ferika Nurfransiska. "Pengaturan Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Normatif Atas Tntangan, Implikasi, Dan Model Regulasi Ideal." Judge: Jurnal Hukum 6.06 (2026): 1890-1897. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i06.1632
11. Kamila, Zahra. "Pengaturan Hukum Dan Prospek Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence Dalam Era Digitalisasi Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia." Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi 2.3 (2025): 16-36. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i3.172
12. Kamila, Zahra. "Pengaturan Hukum Dan Prospek Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence Dalam Era Digitalisasi Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia." Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi 2.3 (2025): 16-36. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i3.172
13. Liba, Yulita, and Supriyadi A. Arief. "Praktek di Pengadilan Berbasis Elektronik: Bentuk Konkret Mewujudkan Transparansi." Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 6.1 (2025): 89-97. https://jurnal.bundamediagrup.co.id/index.php/iuris/article/view/836
14. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Cetak Biru Pembaruan Peradilan 2010-2035. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2010.
15. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Laporan Tahunan 2023. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2023.
16. Marr, Bernard. Artificial Intelligence in Practice: How 50 Successful Companies Used AI and Machine Learning to Solve Problems. Hoboken: Wiley, 2019.
17. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
18. Mayson, Sandra. "Bias In, Bias Out." 128 Yale Law Journal 2218 (2019).
19. Mecca, Anggil Syahra Putri, Wahab Aznul Hidaya, and Hadi Tuasikal. "Pemanfaatan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (artificial intelligence) dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia." Jurnal Sosial Teknologi 5.6 (2025): 1730-1746. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v5i6.32207
20. OECD. Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. Paris: OECD, 2019.
21. Pasquale, Frank. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.
22. Polii, Valentino, and Dian Julius Polii. "Akses keadilan bagi kelompok rentan: studi empiris mengenai hambatan struktural dalam sistem peradilan." Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik 3.1 (2025): 655-674. https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v3i1.2330
23. Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
24. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
25. Rudin, Cynthia. "Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead." Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (2019): 206-215.
26. Schwab, Klaus. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2016.
27. Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI-Press, 1986.
28. Sunstein, Cass R. & Adrian Vermeule. Law and Leviathan: Redeeming the Administrative State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2020.
29. Susskind, Richard. Tomorrow's Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
30. Takwim, Ahsani, and Hena Sulaeman. "EXPLAINABLE AI SEBAGAI SOLUSI BLACK BOX EFFECT DALAM KECERDASAN BUATAN." SEMINAR TEKNOLOGI MAJALENGKA (STIMA). Vol. 9. 2025.
31. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016.
32. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi.
33. Wafi, Muhammad Syafiq, Aloysius Wisnubroto, and Yudi Prayudi. "Artificial Intelligence-Based Deepfake Crimes: A Conception of Culpability Principle as a Criminal Liability Reform." Reformasi Hukum 29.2 (2025): 168-183. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i2.1304
34. World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs Report 2023. Geneva: WEF, 2023.