The Relationship Between Gadget Usage Intensity and Learning Concentration of Junior High School Students

Authors

  • Margarina Kapa Universitas Bakti Indonesia
  • Yosina Makailipessy Universitas Bakti Indonesia
  • Jolenta Jamfaaf Universitas Bakti Indonesia
  • Dessi Pormes Universitas Bakti Indonesia
  • Ahmad Husin Universitas Bakti Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v4i2.613

Keywords:

gadget usage intensity, learning concentration, junior high school students, digital distraction, academic performance

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between gadget usage intensity and learning concentration among junior high school students. The increasing prevalence of smartphones and digital devices among adolescents has raised concerns about their effects on academic performance and cognitive focus. Using a correlational quantitative approach, this study reviewed and synthesized empirical evidence from 20 recent studies (2021–2026) and conducted primary survey data analysis involving 120 junior high school students. Results indicated a significant negative correlation between gadget usage intensity and learning concentration (r = -0.614, p < 0.001). Students who used gadgets more than four hours per day demonstrated markedly lower concentration scores compared to those with limited usage. Social media use, gaming, and entertainment content were identified as the primary distraction factors. Educational use of gadgets, by contrast, showed a modest positive association with learning motivation. These findings suggest the urgent need for digital literacy programs, parental supervision frameworks, and school-based gadget management policies to mitigate adverse effects on student learning concentration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arkin, R. C. (2009). Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. CRC Press.

Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). Free Press.

Ben-Shalom, U., & Benbenisty, Y. (2016). Adaptive leadership in the Israel Defense Forces. Armed Forces & Society, 42(3), 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X15590338

Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.01.001

Brattberg, E., & Cederberg, A. (2020). Civil-military dimensions of defense innovation. Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI).

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

Dempsey, M. E. (2016). Mission command: Reflections on the doctrinal evolution of mission command in the United States Army. Military Review, 96(2), 5–14.

Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.

Gerras, S. J. (2010). Thinking critically about critical thinking: A fundamental guide for strategic leaders. U.S. Army War College.

Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.

Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Harvard Business School Press.

Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1982). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources (4th ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Human Rights Watch. (2012). Losing humanity: The case against killer robots. Human Rights Watch.

Johansen, B. (2012). Leaders make the future: Ten new leadership skills for an uncertain world (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Lawrence, K. (2013). Developing leaders in a VUCA environment. UNC Executive Development.

Lester, P. B., Harms, P. D., Herian, M. N., Krasikova, D. V., & Beal, S. J. (2020). The comprehensive soldier and family fitness program evaluation. U.S. Army Research Institute.

McChrystal, S., Collins, T., Silverman, D., & Fussell, C. (2015). Team of teams: New rules of engagement for a complex world. Portfolio/Penguin.

McMaster, H. R. (2008). Crack in the foundation: Defense transformation and the underlying assumption of dominant knowledge in future war. U.S. Army War College.

Moten, M. (2017). War counsel: American lawyers in the crucible of combat. University Press of Kansas.

Nagl, J. A. (2002). Learning to eat soup with a knife: Counterinsurgency lessons from Malaya and Vietnam. University of Chicago Press.

NATO. (2020). Bi-SC Capstone Concept for the NATO Warfighting Capstone Concept (NWCC). Supreme Allied Commander Europe and Supreme Allied Commander Transformation.

Paparone, C. (2017). The sociology of military science: Prospects for postinstitutional military design. Bloomsbury Academic.

Scharre, P. (2018). Army of none: Autonomous weapons and the future of war. W. W. Norton & Company.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.

Singer, P. W., & Brooking, E. T. (2018). LikeWar: The weaponization of social media. Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

U.S. Army. (2019). Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 6-0: Mission command: Command and control of Army forces. Department of the Army.

Wong, L., & Gerras, S. (2006). The effects of multiple deployments on Army adolescents. Strategic Studies Institute.

Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019835

Zweibelson, B. (2012). Does COIN have a design problem? Small Wars Journal, 8(2), 1–22.

Downloads

Published

29-05-2026

How to Cite

Kapa, M., Makailipessy, Y., Jamfaaf, J., Pormes, D., & Husin, A. (2026). The Relationship Between Gadget Usage Intensity and Learning Concentration of Junior High School Students. MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 4(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v4i2.613

Issue

Section

Articles