Street-Level Bureaucracy in the Digital Age: The Changing Role of Civil Servants in Public Service

This study examines how digitalization reshapes the roles, discretionary practices, and innovative capacities of street-level bureaucrats in public service delivery. The rapid integration of digital technologies, including e-government systems, artificial intelligence, and data-driven platforms, has transformed traditional bureaucratic work and raised critical questions regarding discretion, professional identity, and service quality. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach using in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and document analysis, with data triangulation to ensure validity. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis and constant comparative methods within a socio-technical framework. The findings reveal that digitalization shifts bureaucrats from face-to-face decision-makers to system operators and digital facilitators, while also expanding their roles as intermediaries who assist citizens in navigating digital services. Discretion is not eliminated but reconfigured into three main forms: curtailment, enablement, and continuation. Furthermore, street-level bureaucrats emerge as local innovators who adapt policies and systems to contextual needs. However, digitalization also presents challenges, including reduced human interaction, risks of algorithmic opacity, and potential exclusion of digitally disadvantaged groups. In conclusion, digitalization produces an ambivalent transformation of street-level bureaucracy, requiring a balance between technological efficiency and human-centered governance to ensure inclusive and accountable public services

1. Abdullah, E., Yermekova, A., Wongso, B., & Badruddin, A. (2025). Governing the algorithm: A mediation analysis of digital transformation, bureaucratic discretion, and service quality in a developing democracy. Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v8i4.293
2. Alshallaqi, M. (2022). The complexities of digitization and street-level discretion: A socio-materiality perspective. Public Management Review, 26, 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2042726
3. Andersson, C., Hallin, A., & Ivory, C. (2021). Unpacking the digitalisation of public services: Configuring work during automation in local government. Government Information Quarterly, 39, 101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101662
4. Barodi, M., & Lalaoui, S. (2025). Civil servants’ readiness for AI adoption: The role of change management in Morocco’s public sector. Problems and Perspectives in Management. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.05
5. Chang, A., & Brewer, G. (2022). Street-level bureaucracy in public administration: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 25, 2191–2211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2065517
6. Considine, M., McGann, M., Ball, S., & Nguyen, P. (2022). Can robots understand welfare? Exploring machine bureaucracies in welfare-to-work. Journal of Social Policy, 51, 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000174
7. De Boer, N., & Raaphorst, N. (2021). Automation and discretion: Explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce. Public Management Review, 25, 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684
8. Durose, C., & Lowndes, V. (2023). Gendering discretion: Why street-level bureaucracy needs a gendered lens. Political Studies, 72, 1026–1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231178630
9. Johansson, J. (2024). Research on digital discretion The subjectification of street-level work in public administration. Review of Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12637
10. Jung, H., & Camarena, L. (2024). Street-level bureaucrats & AI interactions in public organizations: An identity-based framework. Public Performance & Management Review, 48, 1423–1452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2447352
11. Larsen, F., Møller, M., & Raaphorst, N. (2025). Public management and street-level bureaucrats. Public Management Review, 27, 1857–1867. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2493875
12. Leminota, V. (2023). Street-level bureaucracy in public services to the elderly in Kosovo. International Journal Papier Public Review. https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v4i3.245
13. Lin, Y., Meng, Y., & Wu, X. (2025). Professional identity and job burnout of street-level bureaucrats in the digital age under the background of the Internet of Things. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129156425409003
14. Marienfeldt, J. (2024). Does digital government hollow out the essence of street-level bureaucracy? A systematic literature review of how digital tools foster curtailment, enablement and continuation of street-level decision-making. Social Policy & Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12991
15. Nagel, M. (2024). The challenge of balancing innovation and tradition in the public sector: The role of street-level bureaucrats in digital transformation. Administration & Society, 57, 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997241296100
16. Northcott, E. (2025). Automating street-level discretion: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70024
17. Paraciani, R., & Rizza, R. (2024). Digital and analogical discretion: An exploratory study of Italian street-level bureaucrats. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDT-07-2024-0018
18. Peeters, R., & Campos, S. (2022). Street-level bureaucracy in weak state institutions: A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89, 977–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221103196
19. Wang, Y. (2025). Street-level bureaucracy meets big data: The moral economy of taxation in China in the digital age. Big Data & Society, 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251321751
20. Zaitsev, D. (2023). Administrative discretion in the digital age. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.99.11.199-208