Street-Level Bureaucracy in the Digital Age: The Changing Role of Civil Servants in Public Service
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v4i2.589Keywords:
Digitalization, Discretion, Public Service, Street-Level Bureaucracy, Technological TransformationAbstract
This study examines how digitalization reshapes the roles, discretionary practices, and innovative capacities of street-level bureaucrats in public service delivery. The rapid integration of digital technologies, including e-government systems, artificial intelligence, and data-driven platforms, has transformed traditional bureaucratic work and raised critical questions regarding discretion, professional identity, and service quality. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach using in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and document analysis, with data triangulation to ensure validity. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis and constant comparative methods within a socio-technical framework. The findings reveal that digitalization shifts bureaucrats from face-to-face decision-makers to system operators and digital facilitators, while also expanding their roles as intermediaries who assist citizens in navigating digital services. Discretion is not eliminated but reconfigured into three main forms: curtailment, enablement, and continuation. Furthermore, street-level bureaucrats emerge as local innovators who adapt policies and systems to contextual needs. However, digitalization also presents challenges, including reduced human interaction, risks of algorithmic opacity, and potential exclusion of digitally disadvantaged groups. In conclusion, digitalization produces an ambivalent transformation of street-level bureaucracy, requiring a balance between technological efficiency and human-centered governance to ensure inclusive and accountable public services
Downloads
References
Abdullah, E., Yermekova, A., Wongso, B., & Badruddin, A. (2025). Governing the algorithm: A mediation analysis of digital transformation, bureaucratic discretion, and service quality in a developing democracy. Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v8i4.293
Alshallaqi, M. (2022). The complexities of digitization and street-level discretion: A socio-materiality perspective. Public Management Review, 26, 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2042726
Andersson, C., Hallin, A., & Ivory, C. (2021). Unpacking the digitalisation of public services: Configuring work during automation in local government. Government Information Quarterly, 39, 101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101662
Barodi, M., & Lalaoui, S. (2025). Civil servants’ readiness for AI adoption: The role of change management in Morocco’s public sector. Problems and Perspectives in Management. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.05
Chang, A., & Brewer, G. (2022). Street-level bureaucracy in public administration: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 25, 2191–2211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2065517
Considine, M., McGann, M., Ball, S., & Nguyen, P. (2022). Can robots understand welfare? Exploring machine bureaucracies in welfare-to-work. Journal of Social Policy, 51, 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000174
De Boer, N., & Raaphorst, N. (2021). Automation and discretion: Explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce. Public Management Review, 25, 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684
Durose, C., & Lowndes, V. (2023). Gendering discretion: Why street-level bureaucracy needs a gendered lens. Political Studies, 72, 1026–1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231178630
Johansson, J. (2024). Research on digital discretion The subjectification of street-level work in public administration. Review of Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12637
Jung, H., & Camarena, L. (2024). Street-level bureaucrats & AI interactions in public organizations: An identity-based framework. Public Performance & Management Review, 48, 1423–1452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2447352
Larsen, F., Møller, M., & Raaphorst, N. (2025). Public management and street-level bureaucrats. Public Management Review, 27, 1857–1867. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2493875
Leminota, V. (2023). Street-level bureaucracy in public services to the elderly in Kosovo. International Journal Papier Public Review. https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v4i3.245
Lin, Y., Meng, Y., & Wu, X. (2025). Professional identity and job burnout of street-level bureaucrats in the digital age under the background of the Internet of Things. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129156425409003
Marienfeldt, J. (2024). Does digital government hollow out the essence of street-level bureaucracy? A systematic literature review of how digital tools foster curtailment, enablement and continuation of street-level decision-making. Social Policy & Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12991
Nagel, M. (2024). The challenge of balancing innovation and tradition in the public sector: The role of street-level bureaucrats in digital transformation. Administration & Society, 57, 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997241296100
Northcott, E. (2025). Automating street-level discretion: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70024
Paraciani, R., & Rizza, R. (2024). Digital and analogical discretion: An exploratory study of Italian street-level bureaucrats. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDT-07-2024-0018
Peeters, R., & Campos, S. (2022). Street-level bureaucracy in weak state institutions: A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89, 977–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221103196
Wang, Y. (2025). Street-level bureaucracy meets big data: The moral economy of taxation in China in the digital age. Big Data & Society, 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251321751
Zaitsev, D. (2023). Administrative discretion in the digital age. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.99.11.199-208
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Iwan Di Wilayah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






