The Reality of the Sacred in Mircea Eliade’s Phenomenology of Religion

Mircea Eliade was a Romanian historian of religion and philosopher from Bucharest. He became influential in religious studies during the 20th century, focusing on the importance of myths and symbols in human experience. Notable works include "The Sacred and the Profane" and "Patterns in Comparative Religion," where he explored personal spiritual experiences and the distinction between the sacred and the profane. Eliade introduced concepts such as hierophanies, which refer to the manifestation of the sacred in everyday life. His scholarship laid the groundwork for comparative religion studies and enriched contemporary discussions on religious theories. His work laid the foundation for comparative religion studies and provided critical insights that inform contemporary discussions of the theories of religion. Scholars have drawn on his concepts to explore themes such as ritual, symbolism, and the human quest for meaning, thereby shaping various theories in the field. Eliade's legacy continues to inform how we study and interpret religions today.

This research aimed to explore Eliade’s perspective on the interpretation of sacred knowledge in religion and beyond. Mircea Eliade’s "The Reality of the Sacred" is significant for several reasons, including the distinction between the sacred and the profane, the importance of myth and symbols, and the concept of Hierophanies. Overall, "The Reality of the Sacred" is celebrated for its innovative ideas and profound implications for understanding the nature of religious experience, positioning Eliade as one of the most influential figures in the study of religion. While his legacy continues to shape contemporary discussions in the field, it is essential to acknowledge certain aspects that might be lacking. Additionally, some criticisms of his writing merit further exploration.

1. Afriyanto, D., Sumarni, S., & Widodo, S. (2024). Analysis of the Ministry of Religion's program in realizing religious moderation in Bantul Regency society (Peter L. Berger's social construction perspective). Asian Journal of Philosophy and Religion. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajpr.v3i1.10434
2. Albustomi, A., & Qomaruzzaman, B. (2024). Patterns of religious behavior in the Sundanese community: Insights from Hasan Mustapa’s work. Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama dan Lintas Budaya. https://doi.org/10.15575/rjsalb.v7i3.30828
3. Chhikara, R. (2022). Celebrating Clifford Geertz’ contributions to anthropology: A tribute on his 15th death anniversary. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences & Humanities. https://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v12i03.022
4. Daniel L. Pals, Nine Theories of Religion, University of Miami: Oxford University Press, 2006.
5. Furseth, I. (2023). An introduction to the sociology of religion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173380
6. Griffiths, M., & Korstanje, M. (2021). Issues of authenticity in religious and spiritual tourism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429201011-23
7. Harding, B. (2021). Minimalist phenomenology and van der Leeuw’s phenomenology of religion. Phenomenology and Mind, 3, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1163/25889613-bja10008
8. Hjelm, T. (2024). Peter L. Berger on religion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003470120
9. Kajfosz, J. (2025). The place of invisible religion and new media folklore in the social construction of reality. Literatura Ludowa. https://doi.org/10.12775/ll.1-2.2025.008
10. Lamothe, K. (2022). Between dancing and writing. Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823224036.001.0001
11. Launay, R. (2022). Defining religion: Durkheim and Weber compared. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020089
12. Macfarlane, A., Hobsbawm, E., & Béteille, R. (2021). Clifford James Geertz. In History, Culture and Ethnography. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003262374-6
13. Mircea Eliade, The Reality of the Sacred, Chapter 7, University of Miami: Oxford University Press, 2006,227-259.
14. Nugroho, A., & Diputra, T. (2023). Religious fanatic subjects in the postmodernism era: The meta-theory of the sociology of religion Peter L. Berger. BELIEF: Sociology of Religion Journal. https://doi.org/10.30983/belief.v1i1.6469
15. Rahmat, E., Waluyajati, R., Huriani, Y., & Hambali, R. (2025). The dual faces of religion: Tolerance and intolerance in a sociological approach. Integritas Terbuka: Peace and Interfaith Studies. https://doi.org/10.59029/int.v4i1.63
16. Samarina, T. (2021). Approaches to the project of new phenomenology of religion in the works of Ninian Smart. Logos et Praxis. https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2021.3.4
17. Watts, G., & Houtman, D. (2022). The spiritual turn and the disenchantment of the world: Max Weber, Peter Berger and the religion–science conflict. The Sociological Review, 71, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221096387
18. Yudhanto, S., & Prayoga, D. (2025). Interpretation of loga statues in Bada Valley culture: An interpretive anthropology study. Dewa Ruci: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni. https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v20i1.6326
19. (2021). The sociological function of religion: Durkheim and Weber. In The End(s) of Religion. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350045286.ch-002
20. (2022). Religion from sociological perspectives: An overview. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.34104/ajssls.022.024031
21. (2024). The tragic concept of love and madness in the dramatic literature of Farhad Nazerzadeh Kermani. British Journal of Arts and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.34104/bjah.024030042
22. Самарина, Т. (2021). Религиозная проблематика в творчестве М. Хайдеггера и феноменология религии: взаимосвязи и параллели. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-9-173-183