Audit Of Kediri Sub-District Office Building For Optimizing Electric Energy

  • I Wayan Dikse Pancane
    Electrical Engineering Study Program, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Sutama
    Electrical Engineering Study Program, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Made Fandy Santra Ari Gunawan
    Electrical Engineering Study Program, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Gede Suarjana
    Dept. of Public Health, Faculty of Sport Science and Public Health, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
  • Yudhi Gunardi
    Deptment of Elekrtical Engineering Universitas Mercubuana (UMB) Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Agus Supranartha
    Departement of Electro Enginering, Elektrical Engineering Program Study Politechnic Negeri Bali, Indonesia
Issue Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): MSJ-May
Release 27-05-2024
Section Articles
Pages 141-150
Abstract

An energy audit is a technique used to calculate the amount of energy consumed in buildings and identify ways to reduce it. The Kediri District Office Building currently uses electrical energy efficiently. However, an energy audit is still necessary to determine the amount of electrical energy used, the IKE value, and identify opportunities for energy savings in the Kediri Sub-District Office Building. The data shows that several rooms in the building do not meet the IKE criteria. Out of 13 rooms, 5 are categorized as wasteful, 1 as efficient, 5 as efficient, and 2 as very efficient based on their IKE calculation. To save electrical energy, consider replacing the AC unit and calculating the necessary cooling capacity (PK) for each room based on its area. Additionally, changing the type of load can help meet IKE criteria without compromising the load's function. After implementing the energy-saving method, the Kediri Sub-District Office Building's average monthly electrical energy consumption decreased to 3,233.52, resulting in an annual consumption of 38,802.24. The IKE calculation for each of the 13 rooms showed that 2 rooms were categorized as very efficient, 8 rooms as efficient, and 3 rooms as quite efficient.  This resulted in an average energy savings of 746.28 per month and cost savings of Rp. 1,268,325 per month.  The English version of the abstract is written using English in the form of past tense and appropriate sentences. Results and conclusions are written in present tense. Abstracts are expected to be more communicative and not monotonous. Text length between 150-250 words. Writing abbreviations and mathematical formulas in the abstract needs to be avoided. The abstract briefly explains the problem, objectives, methods, results and conclusions.

Keywords
Energy Audit Electricity Energy Saving IKE Efficient energy consumption
How to Cite (APA)
Pancane, I. W. D., Sutama, I. W., Ari Gunawan, M. F. S., Suarjana, I. W. G., Gunardi, Y., & Supranartha, A. (2024). Audit Of Kediri Sub-District Office Building For Optimizing Electric Energy. MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 2(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v2i2.135
Licensing & Copyright

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
References
  1. Anonim. (2012). Penghematan Pemakaian Tenaga Listrik. Peraturan Menteri Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2012, 1–14.
  2. Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2014). Statistik SNI. http://bsn.go.id/main/sni/isi_sni/27
  3. Chen, T. A. (2022). Energy Consumption Analysis and Energy-Saving Improvement Methods. In Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction (pp. 311–371). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5295-1_9
  4. Dall’O’, G. (2013). Green Energy Audit: General Aspects. In Green Energy Audit of Buildings (pp. 9–34). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5064-0_2
  5. Dall’O’, G. (2023). Definition of the Green Energy Plan. In Green Energy Audit of Buildings (pp. 163–209). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5064-0_8
  6. Farooq, Z., & Al-Qahtani, A. (2022). Sustainable Energy Efficient Industrial Facility Design. In Energy Consumption, Conversion, Storage, and Efficiency [Working Title]. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108829
  7. Gellings, C. W. (2020). CO2 Reductions through Expanded End-Use Applications of Electricity. In Saving Energy and Reducing CO2 Emissions with Electricity (pp. 39–61). River Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003151647-3
  8. Hasanbeigi, A., & Price, L. (2010). Industrial Energy Audit Guidebook: Guidelines for Conducting an Energy Audit in Industrial Facilities. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI). https://doi.org/10.2172/992484
  9. International Energy Agency. (2021). Saving Electricity in a Hurry. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264109469-en
  10. Jovanović, V. (2022). Conclusions: Energy-Efficient Buildings in Southeast Europe. In Energy-efficient building design in Southeast Europe (pp. 109–116). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24165-0_5
  11. Lee, S. (2020). Changes in Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality during the Audit Contract Period : Focused on Initial Audit. In Accounting Information Review (Vol. 38, Issue 1, pp. 107–129). Korean Accounting Information Association. https://doi.org/10.29189/kaiaair.38.1.05
  12. Li, J., & Just, R. E. (2018). Modeling household energy consumption and adoption of energy efficient technology. In Energy Economics (Vol. 72, pp. 404–415). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.019
  13. Li, K. (2022). Energy audit for building energy conservation. The University of Hong Kong Libraries. https://doi.org/10.5353/th_b3125319
  14. Makkar, L., & Ince, M. (2019). Demonstration Of Energy Efficient Houses As Integrated Systems. In Passive and Low Energy Architecture (pp. 743–758). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-030581-3.50091-8
  15. Mishchenko, V., & Mekhovych, S. (2022). FINANCIAL CHALLENGES OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS EDUCATION. In Energy saving. Power engineering. Energy audit. (Issue 7, pp. 18–24). National Technical University Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute. https://doi.org/10.20998/2313-8890.2021.07.03
  16. No.13, P. E. (2012). Penghematan Pemakaian Tenaga Listrik. Peraturan Menteri Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2012, 1–14.
  17. Price, T. (2021). Energy Audit of MC-1. In Energy Audit of MC-1. US DOE. https://doi.org/10.2172/1656619
  18. Silveira, A. P. P. da, & Mata-Lima, H. (2020). Energy audit in water supply systems: a proposal of integrated approach towards energy efficiency. In Water Policy (Vol. 22, Issue 6, pp. 1126–1141). IWA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2020.203
  19. Wu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020). Evaluation of energy saving effects of tiered electricity pricing and investigation of the energy saving willingness of residents. In Energy Policy (Vol. 109, pp. 208–217). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.011
  20. Zhang, F., Anta, A. F., Wang, L., Hou, C.-Y., & Liu, Z.-Y. (2012). Network Energy Consumption Models and Energy Efficient Algorithms. In Chinese Journal of Computers (Vol. 35, Issue 3, pp. 603–615). China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1016.2012.00603
  21. Febriani, G. S.,dkk. 2023. Pentingnya Kemampuan Berkomunikasi Secara Efektif Dalam Supervisi Hotel.Majority Science Journal (MSJ),Vol. 1No. 3, November.78.
  22. Zhao, L., Liang, R., Zhang, J., Ma, L., & Zhao, T. (2013). A new method for building energy consumption statistics evaluation: ratio of real energy consumption expense to energy consumption. In Energy Systems (Vol. 5, Issue 4, pp. 627–642). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-013-0111-3