A Comparative Analysis of Coral Reef Degradation in Nabire Bay, Indonesia, Using ROV-Based Quantitative Assessment: A Tale of Two Sites

  • Nicodemus Rahanra
    Universitas Papua
  • Abdul Hamid Toha
    Universitas Papua
  • Paulus Boli
    Universitas Papua
  • Selvi Tebay
    Universitas Papua
Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): MSJ - August
Release 11-08-2026
Section Articles
Pages 23-28
Abstract

Coastal marine ecosystems in the Coral Triangle are facing unprecedented threats, yet high-resolution data to guide management remains scarce. This study presents a comparative analysis of coral reef health at two contrasting sites in Nabire Bay, Indonesia, using quantitative data from a Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV). Site 1 (Nabire) and Site 2 (Pulau Nusi) were surveyed to assess benthic composition. The results reveal a stark picture of degradation at both locations, but driven by different ecological dynamics. Site 2 (Pulau Nusi) is in a critical state, with live coral cover at a mere 3.13% and dominated by sand (61.73%) and rubble (21.20%), indicating chronic sedimentation stress. Site 1 (Nabire) shows slightly better but still poor conditions, with live coral cover at 6.64%, but with a higher proportion of dead coral (17.27%). The comparative analysis highlights that while both sites are severely degraded, the dominant degradation driver at Pulau Nusi is likely terrestrial runoff and sedimentation, whereas Site 1 may be experiencing a combination of stressors including a recent mass mortality event. This study underscores the utility of ROV technology for rapid, cost-effective, and quantitative assessment, providing crucial, site-specific data needed to develop targeted conservation and management strategies in a high-priority marine biodiversity region.

Keywords
Coral Reef Degradation ROV Comparative Analysis Sedimentation Nabire Marine Conservation
How to Cite (APA)
Rahanra, N., Toha, A. H., Boli, P., & Tebay, S. (2026). A Comparative Analysis of Coral Reef Degradation in Nabire Bay, Indonesia, Using ROV-Based Quantitative Assessment: A Tale of Two Sites. MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 4(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v4i3.656
Licensing & Copyright

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
References
  1. Ardianor, Supandi, S., Saputra, Y. H. E., Asmawi, S., Yunandar, Y., Sofarini, D., Gunawan, M. A., Handayani, T., Ardani, B., Purnaningsih, T., & Khasanah, R. (2025). Comparative assessment of marine pollution in coral reef sites of South Kalimantan across dry and rainy seasons. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2025.438038.6915
  2. Bruno, J. F., et al. (2007). Thermal stress and coral cover as drivers of coral disease outbreaks. PLoS Biology, 5(6), e124.
  3. Burke, L., Reytar, K., Spalding, M., & Perry, A. (2011). Reefs at Risk Revisited. World Resources Institute.
  4. De Jong, C., Van Os, I., Sepúlveda-Rodríguez, G., De Baat, M., & Schoepf, V. (2025). High-resolution temporal assessment of physicochemical variability and water quality in tropical semi-enclosed bays and coral reefs. Science of the Total Environment, 968, Article 178810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178810
  5. Fabricius, K. E. (2005). Effects of terrestrial runoff on the ecology of corals and coral reefs: review and synthesis. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50(2), 125-146.
  6. Friedman, A., et al. (2012). A new era for coral reef science: the advent of cost-effective and autonomous underwater robotic imaging. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 424, 1-7.
  7. Gilmour, J., Cook, K., Ryan, N., Puotinen, M., Green, R., & Heyward, A. (2021). A tale of two reef systems: Local conditions, disturbances, coral life histories, and the climate catastrophe. Ecological Applications. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2509
  8. Ginting, S. (2023). Limitations of Conventional Diving Methods in Marine Research. Indonesian Journal of Maritime Studies, 25(1), 1-10.
  9. Hadi, T. A., et al. (2019). Status Terumbu Karang Indonesia 2019. Pusat Penelitian Oseanografi LIPI.
  10. Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Mumby, P. J., Hooten, A. J., Steneck, R. S., Greenfield, P., Gomez, E., Harvell, C. D., Sale, P. F., Edwards, A. J., Caldeira, K., Knowlton, N., Eakin, C. M., Iglesias-Prieto, R., Muthiga, N., Bradbury, R. H., Dubi, A., & Hatziolos, M. E. (2007). Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science, 318(5857), 1737-1742.
  11. Kohler, K. E., & Gill, S. M. (2006). Coral Point Count with Excel extensions (CPCe): A Visual Basic program for the determination of coral and substrate coverage using random point count methodology. Computers & Geosciences, 32(9), 1259-1269.
  12. Mumby, P. J., & Steneck, R. S. (2008). Coral reef management and conservation in light of rapidly evolving ecological paradigms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(10), 555-563.
  13. Obura, D. O., & Grimsditch, G. (2009). Resilience Assessment of Coral Reefs-Assessment Protocol for Coral Reefs, focusing on coral bleaching and thermal stress. IUCN.
  14. Paterson, I., Dawson, K. E., Mogg, A., Sayer, M., & Burdett, H. (2024). Quantitative comparison of ROV and diver-based photogrammetry to reconstruct maerl bed ecosystems. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.70007
  15. Rogers, C. S. (1990). Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 62, 185-202.
  16. Saputra, R. A. (2024). Enhancing coral reef restoration assessment using machine learning in Gili Asahan and Kecinan Bay, Lombok, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.18258/69839