Evaluation of ROV-Based Coral Reef Monitoring System: A Comparative Analysis with Underwater Photo Transect in Nabire Waters, Cenderawasih Bay National Park, Indonesia

  • Nicodemus Rahanra
    Universitas Papua
  • Abdul Hamid Toha
    Universitas Papua
  • Paulus Boli
    Universitas Papua
  • Selvi Tebay
    Universitas Papua
Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): MSJ - August
Release 04-08-2026
Section Articles
Pages 1-10
Abstract

Background: Coral reef monitoring in tropical archipelago regions faces persistent challenges including limited diver availability, high operational costs, and safety risks. Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROV) have emerged as a promising technological alternative, yet systematic evaluation of their accuracy and efficiency relative to established quantitative methods remains limited, particularly in Indonesian waters. Methods: A parallel comparative survey was conducted on 6 January 2025 at Nusi Island, Cenderawasih Bay National Park, Nabire, Papua Province, Indonesia. Two stations (Nusi 1 and Nusi 2) were monitored simultaneously using Underwater Photo Transect (UPT) analysed with Coral Point Count with Excel extensions (CPCe) software and a Gladius Mini ROV (MORAL-BOT system). Each UPT station generated ~1,500 random-point classifications from 50 photographic frames along a 50-m transect. Relative deviation analysis and descriptive statistics (Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whitney U, Cohen’s d effect size) were applied to compare methodological performance. Cost and time efficiency were assessed using activity-based costing and time-motion study. Results: UPT-CPCe detected live hard-coral cover (HC) of 29.89% at Nusi 1 (Moderate category) and 3.13% at Nusi 2 (Poor category), with a statistically significant difference (Mann-Whitney U, p < 0.05; Cohen’s d = 1.008, large effect size). ROV estimated HC < 5% at both stations. Mean relative deviation between methods was 87.8% at Nusi 1 (patchy habitat) and 13.1% at Nusi 2 (homogeneous degraded habitat). ROV surveys were completed 3.8× faster (55 min vs. 210 min) and at 83% lower operational cost (Rp 2,100,000 vs. Rp 12,500,000) compared with UPT. Conclusions: UPT-CPCe outperforms ROV in quantitative precision and taxonomic resolution, especially in heterogeneous reef habitats. Conversely, ROV provides significant advantages in operational efficiency, safety, and the ability to access greater depths. A hybrid monitoring protocol—ROV for rapid spatial coverage and UPT for quantitative baseline validation—is recommended as the optimal approach for large-scale, cost-effective reef monitoring in Indonesia’s eastern archipelago.

Keywords
coral reef monitoring remotely operated vehicle underwater photo transect CPCe Cenderawasih Bay ROV accuracy hybrid monitoring protocol
How to Cite (APA)
Rahanra, N., Toha, A. H., Boli, P., & Tebay, S. (2026). Evaluation of ROV-Based Coral Reef Monitoring System: A Comparative Analysis with Underwater Photo Transect in Nabire Waters, Cenderawasih Bay National Park, Indonesia. MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 4(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v4i3.652
Licensing & Copyright

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
References
  1. Apprill, A., Girdhar, Y., Mooney, T. A., Hansel, C. M., Long, M. H., Liu, Y., Zhang, W. G., Kapit, J., Hughen, K., Coogan, J., & Greene, A. (2023). Toward a new era of coral reef monitoring. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(13), 5117–5124. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05369
  2. Boufadel, M., Galgani, F., & Maar, M. (2024). Editorial board. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 202, 116450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116450
  3. Cardenas, J. A., Samadikhoshkho, Z., & Ahmad, R. (2024). A systematic review of robotic efficacy in coral reef monitoring techniques. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 202, 116273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116273
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. English, S., Wilkinson, C., & Baker, V. (1997). Survey manual for tropical marine resources (2nd ed.). ASEAN–Australia Marine Science Project.
  6. Ginting, J. (2023). Analisis kerusakan terumbu karang dan upaya pengelolaannya. Jurnal Kelautan dan Perikanan Terapan, 1, 53.
  7. Giyanto, Manuputty, A. E. W., Abrar, M., Siringoringo, R. M., Suharti, S. R., Wibowo, K., Edrus, I. N., Arbi, U. Y., Hadi, T. A., Budiyanto, A., & Suharsono. (2014). Panduan monitoring kesehatan terumbu karang. COREMAP-CTI, LIPI.
  8. González-Rivero, M., Beijbom, O., Rodriguez-Ramirez, A., Bryant, D. E. P., Ganase, A., & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2020). Monitoring of coral reefs using artificial intelligence: A feasible and cost-effective approach. Remote Sensing, 12(3), 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030489
  9. Hadi, T. A., Abrar, M., Giyanto, Prayudha, B., Johan, O., Budiyanto, A., & Suharsono. (2019). The status of Indonesian coral reefs 2019. Research Center for Oceanography, LIPI.
  10. Hughes, T. P., et al. (2017). Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature, 543, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21707
  11. Indonesian Ministry of Environment Decree No. 4. (2001). Criteria for coral reef damage. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia.
  12. Lawson, C. L., Hill, R., Vercelloni, J., Driessen, J., Esteves, A., Gervais, C., Goldwater, N., & Hoey, A. S. (2025). Low-cost mini-ROV versus diver transect surveys in coral reef monitoring. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 748, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14650
  13. Malinda, C. F., Luthfi, O. M., & Hadi, T. A. (2020). Analisis kondisi kesehatan terumbu karang dengan menggunakan software CPCE di Taman Nasional Komodo. Jurnal Kelautan: Indonesian Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 13(2), 108–114.
  14. Muhtar, F., Armijon, A., Murdapa, F., & Fadly, R. (2020). Analisa luasan terumbu karang di perairan Pulau Tegal Lampung. JGE (Jurnal Geofisika Eksplorasi), 5(2), 141–153.
  15. Obura, D. O., Aeby, G., Amornthammarong, N., Appeltans, W., Bax, N., & Wongbusarakum, S. (2019). Coral reef monitoring, reef assessment technologies, and ecosystem-based management. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00580
  16. Razak, T. B., Lamont, T. A. C., Hukom, F. D., Alisa, C. A. G., Asri, A. R., & Ferse, S. C. A. (2024). A review of the legal framework for coral reef restoration in Indonesia. Ocean and Coastal Management, 248, 106944.
  17. Sala, R., Bawole, R., Biloro, R. H. H., & Manik, M. (2021). Distribusi spasial tutupan karang di Taman Nasional Teluk Cenderawasih, Papua. Jurnal Sumberdaya Akuatik Indopasifik, 5(2), 201–212.
  18. Satoh, N., Sinniger, F., Narisoko, H., Nagahama, S., Okada, N., & Harii, S. (2024). Using underwater mini-ROV for coral eDNA survey: A case study in Okinawan mesophotic ecosystems. Coral Reefs, 44(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02570-7
  19. Shao, X., Chen, H., Magson, K., Wang, J., Song, J., Chen, J., & Sasaki, J. (2024). Deep learning for multilabel classification of coral reef conditions. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 34(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4193
  20. Zahra, A. F., & Samadi, S. (n.d.). Analisis kondisi dan strategi pengelolaan terumbu karang di kawasan Taman Nasional Teluk Cenderawasih [Unpublished manuscript].