Vicarious Religion as A Methodological Challenge in Modern Sociology of Religion

Authors

  • Muhammad Jamil UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Raden Rezeki Alam UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Dody S. Truna UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Rifki Rosyad UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v4i3.640

Keywords:

Vicarious Religion, Sociology of Religion, Secularization, Methodology, Modern Religiosity

Abstract

This study explores the concept of vicarious religion introduced by Grace Davie to explain the transformation of religiosity amid modernity, a process initially predicted to trigger total secularization. The concept refers to a phenomenon in which religious practice is carried out by an active minority on behalf of a passive majority who, despite not participating routinely, still expect religion to be present as a guardian of morals and collective identity. This study aims to explain the theoretical framework of vicarious religion, identify its forms of manifestation, and analyze the methodological challenges it raises for modern sociology of religion. The findings show that vicarious religion is manifested through delegative rituals, beliefs entrusted to specific authorities, moral representation in public issues, and the reactivation of religion’s role as a “reservoir of meaning” in times of crisis. Methodologically, this phenomenon challenges conventional quantitative approaches that measure only physical attendance, and encourages the use of interpretive and mixed methods to capture the latent dimensions of religiosity. In conclusion, there has been a shift from obligation-based to choice-based religion, in which religion continues to perform significant social and symbolic functions through mechanisms of representation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage Publications.

Berger, P. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Doubleday.

Berger, P. L. (1999). The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics. Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the West. Blackwell Publishing.

Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. University of Chicago Press.

Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davie, G. (1994). Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without belonging. Blackwell Publishers.

Davie, G. (2000). Religion in modern Europe: A memory mutates. Oxford University Press.

Davie, G. (2002). Europe: The exceptional case: Parameters of faith in the modern world. Darton, Longman & Todd.

Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1912)

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.

Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25.

Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory (L. A. Coser, Ed. & Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

Hervieu-Léger, D. (2000). Religion as a chain of memory. Rutgers University Press.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Luhmann, N. (2013). A systems theory of religion (D. A. Brenner & A. Hermann, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 2000)

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world (G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.

Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.

Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)

Downloads

Published

28-08-2026

How to Cite

Jamil, M., Alam, R. R., Truna, D. S., & Rosyad, R. (2026). Vicarious Religion as A Methodological Challenge in Modern Sociology of Religion. MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 4(3), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v4i3.640