Local Wisdom in The Process of Criminal Law Enforcement in Papua (Case Study Of Handling Criminal Actions Preceded by Traditional Fine in Wamena, Jayawijaya District)

  • Ricarda Arsensius
    Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Handoyo Prasetyo
    Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Jakarta
  • Slamet Tri Wahyudi
    Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Issue Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): MSJ-May
Release 27-05-2024
Section Articles
Pages 281-291
Abstract

Papua has vital ethnic, cultural and local wisdom. Indigenous communities in Papua have a legal system and social institutions that have been passed down from generation to generation, including resolving conflicts or violations through the mechanism of customary fines (compensation) imposed by customary institutions. In some cases, customary fines imposed by customary institutions for acts categorized as criminal acts in national law are a consideration for law enforcement officials in handling these cases. This shows the integration between customary law and national criminal law in the law enforcement process in Papua. This research aims to determine the impact and contribution of local wisdom in law enforcement in Papua, especially in handling criminal acts involving customary fines. This local wisdom-based approach allows for a more peaceful resolution, focuses on togetherness, and is considered fairer by all parties involved. Traditional heads and traditional institutions play an essential role in mediating and determining the appropriate amount of fines, with deliberation being the key to reaching a fair agreement.

Keywords
Local Wisdom Criminal Law Enforcement Customary Fines Crime Papua
How to Cite (APA)
Arsensius, R., Prasetyo, H., & Wahyudi, S. T. (2024). Local Wisdom in The Process of Criminal Law Enforcement in Papua (Case Study Of Handling Criminal Actions Preceded by Traditional Fine in Wamena, Jayawijaya District). MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 2(2), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v2i2.186
Licensing & Copyright

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
References
  1. Abbas, S. 2011. Mediasi Dalam Hukum Syariah, Hukum Adat, dan Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Prenada Media
  2. Abubakar, L. 2013. Revitalisasi Hukum Adat Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Membangun Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. 13 (2): 319-331
  3. Apriyanto, E. 2016. Penerapan Restorative Justice Sebagai Bentuk Diskresi Kepolisian Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Penipuan Di Polrestabes Semarang. Jurnal Spektrum. 13 (1):55-72
  4. Arliman, L. 2018. Hukum Adat Di Indonesia Dalam Pandangan Para Ahli Dan Konsep Pemberlakuannya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Selat. 5 (2): 177-190
  5. Herlius, F. 2022. Kaidah Hukum Adat Dalam Penuntutan Demi Keadilan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Perspektif. 27 (2): 94-103
  6. Irianto, S., & Shidarta. 2013. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor
  7. Merina, B., & Muhaimin. 2023. Kearifan Lokal Dan Hukum Adat Suku Dani Di Papua. Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia. 3 (1): 35-52
  8. Nugroho, S. A. 2009. Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Telaga Ilmu Indonesia
  9. Nurjaya, I. N. 2011. Memahami Kedudukan dan Kapasitas Hukum Adat Dalam Politik Pembangunan Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Perspektif. 16 (4): 236
  10. Pandeki, G. R. 2018. Peran Polisi Dalam Pengendalian Massa Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Lex Et Societatis. 6 (5): 157-169
  11. Saptomo, A. 2010. Hukum dan Kearifan Lokal Revitalisasi Hukum Adat Nusantara. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo
  12. Yulia. 2016. Buku Ajar Hukum Adat. Lhokseumawe: Unimal Press